On Wed, 2009-05-20 at 14:39 -0700, Chris Leech wrote: > With multiple lports created per netdev, the packet_type structure is no > longer sufficient for receive demux. Instead we need to match on the fabric > ID. > > Signed-off-by: Chris Leech <[email protected]> > --- > > drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c | 70 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > 1 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c b/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c > index 381e4e2..86d8b23 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c > @@ -146,10 +146,48 @@ static int fcoe_fip_recv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct > net_device *dev, > struct net_device *orig_dev) > { > struct fcoe_softc *fc; > + struct fc_lport *tlp, *lp = NULL;
Can we use tlport and lport? I know there are some disagreements about a long term naming convention, but I think we should use rport, lport, etc, until there's a patch to flip all instances to something new. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.open-fcoe.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
