Robert Love wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 10:50 -0800, Robert Love wrote:
>> On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 02:57 -0800, [email protected] wrote:
>>> HI again,
>>>
>> Hi Danilo
>>
>>> all done....
>>>
>>> now i've recompiled  a kernel for enabling DCBX and VLAN but when i try to 
>>> load fcoe module i've got message:
>>>
>>> fcoe: Unknown symbol vlan_dev_real_dev....
>>>
>> I'm working on a patch to update the initiator QUICKSTART, here's what I
>> have for the things that need to be enabled in the kernel configuration.
>> Check your .config against the following settings. I think your error
>> message indicates that you don't have a required VLAN setting turned on.
>>
>> Networking Support -> Networking Options
>>               Data Center Bridging
>>               802.1Q VLAN Support
>>               GVRP (GARP VLAN Registration Protocol) support
>>
>>    Networking Support -> Networking Options -> QoS and/or fair queuing
>>               Multi Band Priority Queueing (PRIO)
>>               Hardware Multiqueue-aware Multi Band Queuing (MULTIQ)
>>               Elementary classification (BASIC)
>>               Universal 32bit comparisons w/ hashing (U32)
>>               Extended Matches
>>                         U32 key
>>               Actions
>>                         SKB Editing
>>
>>    Device Drivers -> SCSI Device Support -> SCSI Low-level drivers
>>               LibFC
>>               LibFCoE
>>               FCoE
>>
>>> i'll try to resolove the issue :).
>>>
>>> anyone has got some configuration of all cfg files? ex open-fcoe.conf , hba.
>>> conf and stuff like that?
>>>
>> On the initiator side open-fcoe.conf is obsolete. Are you trying to run
>> in point-to-point mode or are you connected to a fabric?
> 
> I just wanted to add that much of the DCB configuration settings are
> likely not relevant if you're in point-to-point mode.

As far as I know, point-to-point mode is not working with the current
top-of-stream initiator.  I think there's a problem with the FC_ID
assignment and FLOGI S_ID/D_IDs, even in the non-standard method
that we were using.  I have forgotten some of the the details.

There's a proposal being worked on in FC-BB-6 that extends FIP to work
without an FCF (FC forwarder), and that would be perfect for point-to-point.
It'd probably be better to get that working, or to get the correct
FC-ELS method of point-to-point working rather than to go back to the
old method.

In any case, the old target code is left without a modern FCoE initiator
to connect to in point-to-point mode.

        Joe

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.open-fcoe.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to