On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 01:55 -0800, Jiri Pirko wrote: > Or perhaps this should be applied to net-next? > I think this should go through scsi-misc as all the other libfc/libfcoe/fcoe patches do.
> Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 07:05:35AM CET, [email protected] wrote: > >Check for bonding master and refuse to use that. > > > >Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> > >--- > > drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c | 4 +--- > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > >diff --git a/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c b/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c > >index 9f9600b..3becc6a 100644 > >--- a/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c > >+++ b/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c > >@@ -285,9 +285,7 @@ static int fcoe_interface_setup(struct fcoe_interface > >*fcoe, > > } > > > > /* Do not support for bonding device */ > >- if ((netdev->priv_flags & IFF_MASTER_ALB) || > >- (netdev->priv_flags & IFF_SLAVE_INACTIVE) || > >- (netdev->priv_flags & IFF_MASTER_8023AD)) { > >+ if (netdev->priv_flags & IFF_BONDING && netdev->flags & IFF_MASTER) { > > FCOE_NETDEV_DBG(netdev, "Bonded interfaces not supported\n"); > > return -EOPNOTSUPP; > > } > >-- > >1.7.3.4 > > James, feel free to pick up this patch. I don't have anything in my fcoe tree right now that it would conflict with. I'll also put it in my tree and resend if you don't put it into scsi-misc directly. Acked-by: Robert Love <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.open-fcoe.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
