On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 01:12 +0930, Dan Shearer wrote: > As a few people have commented on these sorts of issues lately, just a > reminder: we're working on stabilising the relationship between > OpenChange and Samba (by picking a canonical version for a while) and on > defining what features of OpenChange we expect to be working and in what > order. That way there should be fewer surprises.
I agree we need to stabilize OpenChange by picking a canonical version ... but for the moment we just can't. There has been a lot of changes both in OC and Samba4 code since we released libmapi-0.4. Furthermore libmapi-0.6 uses piece of code from very recent Samba4 revision which basically break libmapi compatibility with previous Samba4 TPs (4 and 5). There is also a bug in Samba4 that prevent from using libmapiadmin with current code (the *famous* charset issue). Once fixed, I think we can discuss it again and choose whether we wait for samba4-alpha2 or just pick up a particular Samba4 revision. -- Julien Kerihuel [EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenChange Project Manager GPG Fingerprint: 0B55 783D A781 6329 108A B609 7EF6 FE11 A35F 1F79
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.openchange.org/listinfo/devel
