On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 06:08:46PM +0200, Julien Kerihuel wrote: > On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 01:12 +0930, Dan Shearer wrote: > > As a few people have commented on these sorts of issues lately, just a > > reminder: we're working on stabilising the relationship between > > OpenChange and Samba (by picking a canonical version for a while) and on > > defining what features of OpenChange we expect to be working and in what > > order. That way there should be fewer surprises. > > I agree we need to stabilize OpenChange by picking a canonical > version ... but for the moment we just can't.
Sure, that's where we're headed. We've got the opportunity to talk to Jelmer and Andrew next week in detail about their plans for Samba4 alpha series and how that affects not only libmapi (which is what you're talking about here) but also the server side when we turn our attention to it again shortly. Otherwise we're going to be chasing our tails for the rest of '07. > current code (the *famous* charset issue). Once fixed, I think we can > discuss it again and choose whether we wait for samba4-alpha2 or just > pick up a particular Samba4 revision. I think you looking more short-term than I am, and we are agreed. -- Dan Shearer [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.openchange.org/listinfo/devel
