Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 11:57 +0400, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
>> The __mandatory_lock(inode) macro makes the same check, but
>> makes the code more readable.
> 
> Could we please avoid using underscores in macros. Also, why are we
> breaking the usual convention of capitalising macro names?

Sorry, I've forgot to change all the log - this is not a macro, 
but a static inline function. The underscores are here, because 
the mandatory_lock() one already exists and additionally checks 
for "if (IS_MANDLOCK(inode))"

Thanks,
Pavel

> Cheers
>   Trond
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Cc: Trond Myklebust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> ---
>>
>>  fs/nfs/file.c |    3 +--
>>  1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/nfs/file.c b/fs/nfs/file.c
>> index 73ddd2e..7a07be1 100644
>> --- a/fs/nfs/file.c
>> +++ b/fs/nfs/file.c
>> @@ -605,8 +605,7 @@ static int nfs_lock(struct file *filp, i
>>      nfs_inc_stats(inode, NFSIOS_VFSLOCK);
>>  
>>      /* No mandatory locks over NFS */
>> -    if ((inode->i_mode & (S_ISGID | S_IXGRP)) == S_ISGID &&
>> -        fl->fl_type != F_UNLCK)
>> +    if (__mandatory_lock(inode) && fl->fl_type != F_UNLCK)
>>              return -ENOLCK;
>>  
>>      if (IS_GETLK(cmd))
>>
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@openvz.org
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to