[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> I don't like the name "newmnt" for the option; it is not just another
>> mount, but a whole new instance of the pty space.
>
> I agree. Its mostly a place-holder for now. How about newns or newptsns ?
>
I suggest "newinstance", but "newns" works, too.
>> I observe you didn't incorporate my feedback with regards to get_node().
>
> Yes, I have not addressed it yet. Will look into it in the next pass,
> but will add to the todo list now.
OK.
-hpa
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
