On 13 May 2013 16:16, Glauber Costa <[email protected]> wrote: > On 05/13/2013 12:11 PM, Igor M Podlesny wrote: >> On 13 May 2013 16:11, Glauber Costa <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On 05/13/2013 12:08 PM, Igor M Podlesny wrote: >>>> On 13 May 2013 15:50, Glauber Costa <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> [...] >>>>>> Aren't macroses supposed to be UPPER CASE named? [...] > putting CC back > > The way I see it, there is absolutely nothing to fix here. > As I explained above, I believe coding style exists for a reason, and > call for consistency to help one derive things about unknown code easier. > > This is a local macro, only exist within the scope of this function, it > is use-once-and-forget, and won't be available anywhere else in the code. > > In this particular case, the only difference between the existing and > proposed version is that one is easier to type, and the other is harder.
Whoa, I don't insist, it was a suggestion and as to me it's quite logical to fix inconsistent code style along with other fixes which changes the same lines anyway. -- _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
