----- Original Message ----- > From: "Greg Sheremeta" <[email protected]> > To: "Yair Zaslavsky" <[email protected]> > Cc: "Itamar Heim" <[email protected]>, [email protected], "Alon Bar-Lev" > <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, August 22, 2014 8:39:54 PM > Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] [ENGINE] thoughts about LinqUtils > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Yair Zaslavsky" <[email protected]> > > To: "Itamar Heim" <[email protected]> > > Cc: [email protected] > > Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 8:39:31 PM > > Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] [ENGINE] thoughts about LinqUtils > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Itamar Heim" <[email protected]> > > > To: "Yair Zaslavsky" <[email protected]>, "Yevgeny Zaspitsky" > > > <[email protected]> > > > Cc: [email protected] > > > Sent: Friday, August 22, 2014 12:25:52 AM > > > Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] [ENGINE] thoughts about LinqUtils > > > > > > On 08/21/2014 09:55 AM, Yair Zaslavsky wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > >> From: "Yevgeny Zaspitsky" <[email protected]> > > > >> To: "Yair Zaslavsky" <[email protected]> > > > >> Cc: "Moti Asayag" <[email protected]>, "Allon Mureinik" > > > >> <[email protected]>, [email protected] > > > >> Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 4:35:33 PM > > > >> Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] [ENGINE] thoughts about LinqUtils > > > >> > > > >> On 21/08/14 12:08, Yair Zaslavsky wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>> ----- Original Message ----- > > > >>>> From: "Yevgeny Zaspitsky" <[email protected]> > > > >>>> To: "Moti Asayag" <[email protected]> > > > >>>> Cc: "Yair Zaslavsky" <[email protected]>, "Allon Mureinik" > > > >>>> <[email protected]>, [email protected] > > > >>>> Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 11:26:40 AM > > > >>>> Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] [ENGINE] thoughts about LinqUtils > > > >>>> > > > >>>> It seems like we can try moving to common-collections4. Yum on my > > > >>>> Fedora20 > > > >>>> computer finds apache-commons-collections4 package. Fortunately > > > >>>> somebody > > > >>>> packed the jar into for a rpm for us. :-) > > > >>> What about RHEL 6.5? Can you please run a quick check? > > > >> Unfortunately my happiness was too hasty. Only Fedora people care to > > > >> be > > > >> in the forward of the technology... The RHEL ones do not care about > > > >> that... > > > > > > > > This is what I remembered. When you responded to the email for the > > > > first > > > > time , I had a strong deja vu that you tried addressing this issue > > > > yourself in the past (commons-collectios4) - due to different reason. > > > > > > > > > > is there a specific conflict or problem (or a huge chain of dependencies) > > > ? > > > > To me it seems the answer to both is no - > > > > This is the requirement list - > > > > java >= 1.5 > > jpackage-utils > > rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 > > rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 > > rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 > > rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 > > > > > > Probably a matter of packaging? > > IIRC, Alon was the one who replied, and the issue was that Jboss included an > old version (and we don't have classpath isolation, I guess) > > Greg >
We would like to avoid maintaining and package components that are not provider either by el6 or jboss distribution. But based on other threads, it seems that I am the only one who remained trying to push compliance to the old ways, people feel that can maintain anything anywhere with no effort. Regards, Alon _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
