On 07/22/2015 09:42 AM, Fabian Deutsch wrote:
Hey,
I've seen that some new code landed to support Engine registration
using the generic registration approach.
But it seem that we now have two implementations:
1. vdsm-tool register [0]
2. ovirt-register [1]
To reduce code duplication I'd suggest to drop one of these approaches
before we enter 3.6.
Or are there reasons for keeping both of them?
I believe not.
My take is to keep ovirt-register which is independent and would allow
us to add plain hosts to Engine (host-deploy is then taking care of
the rest IIUIC).
The vdsm-tool approach reuqires vdsm to be installed.
Thoughts?
+1 for dropping vdsm-tool register verb. It started as alternative and
later we merged everything in ovirt-register project which is the
generic registration. I can send a patch to drop it soon.
Greetings
fabian
---
[0] https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/40966/
[1] https://gerrit.ovirt.org/gitweb?p=ovirt-register.git
--
Cheers
Douglas
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
