On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Douglas Schilling Landgraf <[email protected]> wrote: > On 07/22/2015 09:42 AM, Fabian Deutsch wrote: >> >> Hey, >> >> I've seen that some new code landed to support Engine registration >> using the generic registration approach. >> >> But it seem that we now have two implementations: >> >> 1. vdsm-tool register [0] >> 2. ovirt-register [1] >> >> To reduce code duplication I'd suggest to drop one of these approaches >> before we enter 3.6. >> Or are there reasons for keeping both of them? > > I believe not.
Great. >> My take is to keep ovirt-register which is independent and would allow >> us to add plain hosts to Engine (host-deploy is then taking care of >> the rest IIUIC). >> The vdsm-tool approach reuqires vdsm to be installed. >> >> Thoughts? > > > +1 for dropping vdsm-tool register verb. It started as alternative and later > we merged everything in ovirt-register project which is the generic > registration. I can send a patch to drop it soon. Right. So let's see what Dan replies and then we can possibly drop the duplicate effort. Thanks fabian _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
