Hi! > On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 01:08:24PM +0100, Kaspar Schleiser wrote: > > On 12/15/2014 11:10 AM, Ludwig Ortmann wrote: > > >I'd rather add a static linking exception to our > > >current license (or switch to GPL with linking exception which amounts > > >to the same as far as I remember) > > What kind of "static linking exception" do you have in mind? > > The regular kind ;) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPL_linking_exception > I'm not aware if there is another kind with different characteristics.
In general, I would agree that - to my understanding - (L)GPL with linker
exception is more aligned to what we're looking for than to LGPL only.
The last time I though and researched about this topic, I came to the
conclusion that the main problems of the linking exception clause is, that
there's no "official" version of it. So, we might end up in a similar case
compared to inventing our own license.
Cheers,
Oleg
--
DPRINTK("doing direct send\n"); /* @@@ well, this doesn't work anyway */
linux-2.6.6/drivers/atm/eni.c
pgpyrrgUDzdhZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@riot-os.org http://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
