+1 for riotdocker, riotbuild is confusing.
On Tue, 24 Feb 2015, Joakim Gebart wrote:
> riotdocker is more descriptive for the github repo name, I like it.
> Best regards, Joakim
> On Feb 24, 2015 8:20 AM, "Oleg Hahm" <oliver.h...@inria.fr> wrote:
> Hi Joakim!
> > What is a suitable name for the new repo?
> > I have been using "riotbuild" for my Docker development at
> > https://github.com/gebart/riotbuild
> I don't have any particular ideas for the name, so, for me "riotbuild"
> "riotdocker") would be fine.
> > Also, I need to have an organisation owner (Oleg, Kaspar, Emmanuel or
> > Matthias Wählisch) create the repo since maintainers do not have the
> > access to do it.
> Sure, I can do so. Let's wait if no one objects against the proposed
> The problem with git jokes is everyone has their own version.
> devel mailing list
. Freie Universitaet Berlin, Inst. fuer Informatik, AG CST
. Takustr. 9, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
.. mailto:waehli...@ieee.org .. http://www.inf.fu-berlin.de/~waehl
:. Also: http://inet.cpt.haw-hamburg.de .. http://www.link-lab.net
devel mailing list