Hi again everyone, just one general comment: this thread currently has a lower priority compared to the efforts towards next month's new RIOT release. So basically, for those involved: take your time to provide input other than +1 for the idea of having such a task force ;) I plan to provide soonish some input on the tentative definition of what a task force is (and what it is not).
Best, Emmanuel On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Emmanuel Baccelli < emmanuel.bacce...@inria.fr> wrote: > > On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 7:53 AM, Oleg Hahm <oliver.h...@inria.fr> wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> > - introducing a "show-stopper" textual label for comments on >> PRs >> > (if absent, would require less or no ACK before being merged, after some >> > agreed-upon probation time). The idea would be to increase agility >> > - introducing a "high-impact" label on PRs (would require more >> > ACKs before being merged). >> >> That's pretty much the idea of the labels "minor" and "major" (impact). >> >> > > @Kaspar care to comment? If I remember correctly you saw some use in > introducing something like the "high-impact" label? > > Cheers > > Emmanuel > > > >> Cheers, >> Oleg >> -- >> printk("; corrupted filesystem mounted read/write - your computer >> will explode within 20 seconds ... but you wanted it so!\n"); >> linux-2.4.3/fs/hpfs/super.c >> >> _______________________________________________ >> devel mailing list >> devel@riot-os.org >> https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >> >> >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@riot-os.org https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel