Hey, On 05/28/15 15:59, Emmanuel Baccelli wrote: > > - introducing a "show-stopper" textual label for comments on > PRs > > (if absent, would require less or no ACK before being merged, after some > > agreed-upon probation time). The idea would be to increase agility > > - introducing a "high-impact" label on PRs (would require more > > ACKs before being merged). > > That's pretty much the idea of the labels "minor" and "major" (impact). > > @Kaspar care to comment? If I remember correctly you saw some use in > introducing something like the "high-impact" label? They would do fine. We should but some rough guidelines on when something is "major" and that it then needs at least two ACKs and an extended concept review.
Kaspar _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@riot-os.org https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
