OK, I could go ahead and modify the wiki with some tentative text for that, which we could refine later on. In practice:
- would Kaspar agree he was the shepherd of the timers task force? - would Martine & Hauke agree they were the shepherds of the nasty task force? - would Martine & Hauke agree they are the shepherds of the documentation task force? - who would take on the shepherding for the OTA task force? If no-one speaks up, we could classify this TF as dormant the time being. On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Oleg Hahm <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi! > > Sounds like a sensible proposal to me. > > Cheers, > Oleg > > Am Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 03:51:36PM +0100 schrieb Emmanuel Baccelli: > > +1 here too. > > I think it is also important to describe to malloc and free :) > > I mean how to: > > > > 1 - create a new task force (hopefully we have a lot more to come!) > > 2 - join/ping/revive an existing task force (e.g. OTA is somewhat > dormant) > > 3 - dissolve an existing task force > > > > For creating: how about, simply stating something like: > > "If you wish to launch a new task force, go ahead, create your wikipage, > > and report your progress or summarize the latest stand of your > discussions > > on [email protected]" > > There's the slight possibility that duplicate work may happen down the > > line, if a lot of task forces are active at the same time. > > But this is not dangerous right now. If we want to cover this case, maybe > > we can add: "RIOT maintainers will contact you if duplicate or very > > closely-related work has been detected elsewhere, and if joining forces > > might make sense." > > > > For ping/join/revive how about naming one or two shepherds per task > force, > > that could be pinged? > > > > For dissolving: how about "either (i) the shepherd(s) declares the TF is > > done, or gives up, or (ii) the shepherds are unreachable, the TF has been > > dormant for a long time and RIOT maintainers declare the TF dissolved" > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Kaspar Schleiser <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Hey, > > > On 11/19/15 14:48, Oleg Hahm wrote: > > > > As an effort to "formalize" this idea of task forces a little bit > more, > > > I just > > > > created a small page in the Wiki: > > > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > I've updated the xtimer page. > > > > > > Kaspar > > > _______________________________________________ > > > devel mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > devel mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > > > -- > /* Thanks to Rob `CmdrTaco' Malda for not influencing this code in any > * way. > */ > linux-2.4.3/net/core/netfilter.c > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
