On 19.11.2015 16:50, Emmanuel Baccelli wrote:
OK, I could go ahead and modify the wiki with some tentative text for
that, which we could refine later on.
In practice:
- would Kaspar agree he was the shepherd of the timers task force?
- would Martine & Hauke agree they were the shepherds of the nasty
task force?
yes
- would Martine & Hauke agree they are the shepherds of the
documentation task force?
and yes
Cheers,
Hauke
- who would take on the shepherding for the OTA task force? If no-one
speaks up, we could classify this TF as dormant the time being.
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Oleg Hahm <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi!
Sounds like a sensible proposal to me.
Cheers,
Oleg
Am Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 03:51:36PM +0100 schrieb Emmanuel Baccelli:
> +1 here too.
> I think it is also important to describe to malloc and free :)
> I mean how to:
>
> 1 - create a new task force (hopefully we have a lot more to come!)
> 2 - join/ping/revive an existing task force (e.g. OTA is
somewhat dormant)
> 3 - dissolve an existing task force
>
> For creating: how about, simply stating something like:
> "If you wish to launch a new task force, go ahead, create your
wikipage,
> and report your progress or summarize the latest stand of your
discussions
> on [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>"
> There's the slight possibility that duplicate work may happen
down the
> line, if a lot of task forces are active at the same time.
> But this is not dangerous right now. If we want to cover this
case, maybe
> we can add: "RIOT maintainers will contact you if duplicate or very
> closely-related work has been detected elsewhere, and if joining
forces
> might make sense."
>
> For ping/join/revive how about naming one or two shepherds per
task force,
> that could be pinged?
>
> For dissolving: how about "either (i) the shepherd(s) declares
the TF is
> done, or gives up, or (ii) the shepherds are unreachable, the TF
has been
> dormant for a long time and RIOT maintainers declare the TF
dissolved"
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Kaspar Schleiser
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> wrote:
>
> > Hey,
> > On 11/19/15 14:48, Oleg Hahm wrote:
> > > As an effort to "formalize" this idea of task forces a
little bit more,
> > I just
> > > created a small page in the Wiki:
> > >
> > > What do you think?
> >
> > +1
> >
> > I've updated the xtimer page.
> >
> > Kaspar
> > _______________________________________________
> > devel mailing list
> > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> > https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> >
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
--
/* Thanks to Rob `CmdrTaco' Malda for not influencing this code in any
* way.
*/
linux-2.4.3/net/core/netfilter.c
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
