Maybe "map"? ----- Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org> schrieb: > On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Sebastian Huber > <sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > > > > ----- Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org> schrieb: > >> I don't understand the name "adjust"? I think of adjusting as > >> something that would cause a change or modify, which is not the case > >> here. I don't have any great replacement, but I guess I might suggest > >> "dereference"? > > > > You may adjust the pointer value, e.g. node + offset. Dereference is > > wrong, since you are not supposed to do a *node. Maybe "fixup"? > > > As I understand it, this callout does not modify the tree or node, so > I would avoid using any verb that implies a change happens: fixup > implies some modification to me. Perhaps I misunderstood, but the > comment says the callout should "get the return value" of a found > node. get_value() would be OK except for slight overload with POSIX > keys. read()? > > I'm not coming up with any great ideas.
-- Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09 E-Mail : sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de PGP : Public key available on request. Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel