Now is the time to rename. Back porting patches is harder if the name is changed later
On Dec 8, 2017 10:35 AM, "Gedare Bloom" <ged...@rtems.org> wrote: > Question: should we rename the header to cacheimpl.h to reflect the > intent as an internal header, or leave it alone? > > On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org> wrote: > > On 07/12/2017 19:20, Sebastian Huber wrote: > >> This is a cache manager implementation header file. > > > > Excellent. This one is now solved. > > > > Thanks > > Chris > > _______________________________________________ > > devel mailing list > > devel@rtems.org > > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
