On Dec 9, 2017 2:14 PM, "Chris Johns" <chr...@rtems.org> wrote:


On 9 Dec 2017, at 3:50 am, Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote:

Now is the time to rename. Back porting patches is harder if the name is
changed later

On Dec 8, 2017 10:35 AM, "Gedare Bloom" <ged...@rtems.org> wrote:

> Question: should we rename the header to cacheimpl.h to reflect the
> intent as an internal header, or leave it alone?
>

After the move?



Yes. Finish the move, then rename. But before 5.x


Chris
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to