On 12/04/2018 14:58, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 11/04/18 23:09, Chris Johns wrote: >> Is it a requirement for Makefile.am we avoid line continuation? > > For the source moves in the BSP tree I need Makefile.am which are friendly for > automatic modification. The line continuation makes this a little bit more > difficult.
I use the class at the top of this file to make bulk changes these days: https://ftp.rtems.org/pub/rtems/people/chrisj/test-am-convert I used it for the preinstall work and now the testsuite change. It handles line continuation, insert, delete, you can find something and then do a range of edits. The script took me to within a few % of the completing the testsuite task, the mp_tests I did by hand. > >> >> I had a choice and wrapped lines in the testsuites and without any >> guidelines I >> choose a more compact format. It was easy to do with python's textwrap >> module. >> >> At some point I think it would be good to collect together what we want to do >> with Makefile.am files as some form of a coding standard. I have some things >> that might go in like conditionals .. >> >> https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2018-April/020889.html > > I think we should focus on waf guidelines. The Makefile.am are a dead man > walking. > Agreed. Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel