On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 11:43 AM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee <vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 20 July 2018 at 19:44, Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 6:29 PM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee >> <vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Hello, >> > >> > I used the following command >> > >> > ==================== >> > $HOME/development/rtems/test/rtems-tools/tester/rtems-test \ >> > --rtems-tools=$HOME/development/rtems/5 --log=coverage_analysis.log \ >> > --no-clean --coverage=score --rtems-bsp=leon3-qemu-cov \ >> > >> > /home/lunatic/development/rtems/kernel/leon3/sparc-rtems5/c/leon3/testsuites >> > --debug-trace=cov >> > ==================== >> > >> > and I'm getting the following error >> > >> > =================== >> > error: coverage: covoar failure:: -9 >> > =================== >> > >> >> What does error code -9 mean from covoar? >> > I don't know what does code -9 mean. > The error is coming from here > https://github.com/RTEMS/rtems-tools/blob/master/tester/rt/coverage.py#L329 >
I should have said, "Can you figure out what error code -9 means?" You'll have to trace back to find where it originates. > I will run coverage for testsuites/ again and upload the log file here. >> >> Does it make any progress at all? >> > The tests are running but coverage doesn't progress at all. >> >> > This, however, runs fine for samples/ >> > >> >> does this command work for you without using the cov options? >> > yes >> >> > I think this will probably be on hold as Chris seems to be >> > on a break, meanwhile, I want to do a wrapup work on >> > the non-gcov coverage reports, I seek suggestions/advice >> > for the same. >> > >> > The current state is that the coverage reports can be generated >> > for one symbol-set only, There's a ticket for the support of >> > generating separate reports of multiple sets from covoar. >> > >> > https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3441 >> > >> > Please let me know of any suggestions including suggestions >> > regarding documentation as Coverage needs more >> > documentation. >> > >> >> What is the existing documentation for coverage? >> > I found these links > > https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/TBR/UserManual/RTEMS_Coverage_Analysis > https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/Developer/Coverage/Theory > https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/Developer/Coverage/Analysis > We need to capture this stuff in a proper manual. At least it could start as a chapter in the user manual, maybe? @Joel ideas? >> > Thanks >> > -- vijay >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > devel mailing list >> > devel@rtems.org >> > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > > _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel