On Fri, Jul 20, 2018, 9:19 PM Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 11:43 AM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee > <vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 20 July 2018 at 19:44, Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org> wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 6:29 PM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee > >> <vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > Hello, > >> > > >> > I used the following command > >> > > >> > ==================== > >> > $HOME/development/rtems/test/rtems-tools/tester/rtems-test \ > >> > --rtems-tools=$HOME/development/rtems/5 --log=coverage_analysis.log \ > >> > --no-clean --coverage=score --rtems-bsp=leon3-qemu-cov \ > >> > > >> > > /home/lunatic/development/rtems/kernel/leon3/sparc-rtems5/c/leon3/testsuites > >> > --debug-trace=cov > >> > ==================== > >> > > >> > and I'm getting the following error > >> > > >> > =================== > >> > error: coverage: covoar failure:: -9 > >> > =================== > >> > > >> > >> What does error code -9 mean from covoar? > >> > > I don't know what does code -9 mean. > > The error is coming from here > > > https://github.com/RTEMS/rtems-tools/blob/master/tester/rt/coverage.py#L329 > > > > I should have said, "Can you figure out what error code -9 means?" > You'll have to trace back to find where it originates. > I am looking into it.
> > I will run coverage for testsuites/ again and upload the log file here. > >> > >> Does it make any progress at all? > >> > > The tests are running but coverage doesn't progress at all. > >> > >> > This, however, runs fine for samples/ > >> > > >> > >> does this command work for you without using the cov options? > >> > > yes > >> > >> > I think this will probably be on hold as Chris seems to be > >> > on a break, meanwhile, I want to do a wrapup work on > >> > the non-gcov coverage reports, I seek suggestions/advice > >> > for the same. > >> > > >> > The current state is that the coverage reports can be generated > >> > for one symbol-set only, There's a ticket for the support of > >> > generating separate reports of multiple sets from covoar. > >> > > >> > https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3441 > >> > > >> > Please let me know of any suggestions including suggestions > >> > regarding documentation as Coverage needs more > >> > documentation. > >> > > >> > >> What is the existing documentation for coverage? > >> > > I found these links > > > > https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/TBR/UserManual/RTEMS_Coverage_Analysis > > https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/Developer/Coverage/Theory > > https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/Developer/Coverage/Analysis > > > > We need to capture this stuff in a proper manual. At least it could > start as a chapter in the user manual, maybe? @Joel ideas? > > >> > Thanks > >> > -- vijay > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > devel mailing list > >> > devel@rtems.org > >> > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > > > > >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel