On 17/3/20 5:23 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 17/03/2020 01:05, Amar Takhar wrote: > >> On 2020-03-17 10:55 +1100, Chris Johns wrote: >>> On 17/3/20 7:21 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>>> Chris, what do you think about using pytest in favour of the standard >>>> Python >>>> unitttest? >>> I am fine with pytest. Testing is a development feature and so we can have a >>> different criteria for the needed dependencies. >> If we're choosing pytest I'd like to see explicit documentation of what >> pattern >> to use for which situations. >> >> It's really easy to fall into traditional patterns for non Python languages >> which means we lose advantages of going to pytest. > This sounds like a great addition to the Testing section in the new Python > Development Guidelines chapter of the engineering manual.
+1 Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
