On Mon, Jul 6, 2020, 6:14 PM Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 10:12 AM Mritunjay Sharma > <mritunjaysharma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > Thank you, Heinz, Gedare, Chris and Joel for your advice. > > If there are issues in making a buildset for 4.10 > > then should I build EPICS with RTEMS 5 by hand first and note > > down the process and then proceed to make the buildset for it? > > > > Yes. >
+1 And by 5, we definitely mean the 5 branch for all rtems repo and the similarly named one for libbsd. > > > Please suggest for the future steps. > > > > Thanks > > Mritunjay > > > > On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 5:38 AM Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> On Sun, Jul 5, 2020, 6:12 PM Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org> wrote: > >>> > >>> On 6/7/20 12:47 am, Heinz Junkes wrote: > >>> > Thank you, this is exactly where I was unsure. > >>> > @Chris: Can you give a recommendation here? > >>> > Danke Heinz > >>> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >>> > Fritz-Haber-Institut | Phone: (+49 30) 8413-4270 > >>> > Heinz Junkes | Fax (G3+G4): (+49 30) 8413-5900 > >>> > Faradayweg 4-6 | VC: 102220181...@bjn.vc > >>> > D - 14195 Berlin | E-Mail: jun...@fhi-berlin.mpg.de > >>> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >>> > > >>> >> On 5. Jul 2020, at 16:20, Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org> wrote: > >>> >> > >>> >> On Sat, Jul 4, 2020 at 1:18 PM Mritunjay Sharma > >>> >> <mritunjaysharma...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 12:28 AM Heinz Junkes < > jun...@fhi-berlin.mpg.de> wrote: > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> Hello, Mritunjay, > >>> >>>> that's good news. Don't you want to try to develop a rsb-set for > exactly this combination of RTEMS4.10 and EPICS7? > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> Sure, I am ready to do this and then do it with RTEMS5 in the same > way. Please tell how to begin or some existing similar > >>> >>> work that can guide me how to proceed further in relation to > rsb-set for RTEMS4.10 and EPICS7. > >>> >>> > >>> >> > >>> >> I don't know if this is best. RSB didn't exist in 4.10. I haven't > >>> >> looked to see how well the rtems-source-builder/4.10 would support a > >>> >> package build. It should be discussed with Chris probably. A couple > of > >>> >> packages were added in the 4.11 branch. > >>> > >>> I would leave 4.10 and move on. It may work but these things can > expose issues > >>> that turn into distractions. > >>> > >>> Would making a script that does the build so we can document the steps > be worth > >>> while > >> > >> > >> Yes. Emphatically yes. We need to make sure we know how it is best > built by hand to automate it. > >> > >> I firmly believe you should not attempt to automate something until > doing it manually is well understood and documented. > >> > >> After you have this down for one BSP, we need to ask questions like: > >> > >> + Is there any per BSP tailoring beyond the obviod architecture and > compilation settings? > >> > >> + Any tweaks to settings users may want? > >> > >> The manual process should include testing. The RSB is a great way to > automate and ease building but it doesn't address testing the packages yet. > >> > >> --joel > >> > >>> > >>> Chris > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> devel mailing list > >>> devel@rtems.org > >>> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> devel mailing list > >> devel@rtems.org > >> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel