On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 5:33 AM Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 5:49 PM Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 6, 2020, 6:14 PM Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org> wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 10:12 AM Mritunjay Sharma > >> <mritunjaysharma...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > >> > Hello everyone, > >> > > >> > Thank you, Heinz, Gedare, Chris and Joel for your advice. > >> > If there are issues in making a buildset for 4.10 > >> > then should I build EPICS with RTEMS 5 by hand first and note > >> > down the process and then proceed to make the buildset for it? > >> > > >> > >> Yes. > > > > > > +1 > > > > And by 5, we definitely mean the 5 branch for all rtems repo and the > similarly named one for libbsd. > > Excellent point. We want to add support for easy build (and eventually > test) of EPICS+RTEMS starting with 5.1 and moving forward, which means > also doing it for RTEMS 6, Mritunjay. > > Sounds good, I have begun building it hand by today for RTEMS 5 branch and later on continue the same for RTEMS6 Thank you so much Gedare and Joel. Mritunjay > >> > >> > >> > Please suggest for the future steps. > >> > > >> > Thanks > >> > Mritunjay > >> > > >> > On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 5:38 AM Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> On Sun, Jul 5, 2020, 6:12 PM Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> On 6/7/20 12:47 am, Heinz Junkes wrote: > >> >>> > Thank you, this is exactly where I was unsure. > >> >>> > @Chris: Can you give a recommendation here? > >> >>> > Danke Heinz > >> >>> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> >>> > Fritz-Haber-Institut | Phone: (+49 30) 8413-4270 > >> >>> > Heinz Junkes | Fax (G3+G4): (+49 30) 8413-5900 > >> >>> > Faradayweg 4-6 | VC: 102220181...@bjn.vc > >> >>> > D - 14195 Berlin | E-Mail: jun...@fhi-berlin.mpg.de > >> >>> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> >>> > > >> >>> >> On 5. Jul 2020, at 16:20, Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org> wrote: > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> On Sat, Jul 4, 2020 at 1:18 PM Mritunjay Sharma > >> >>> >> <mritunjaysharma...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>> On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 12:28 AM Heinz Junkes < > jun...@fhi-berlin.mpg.de> wrote: > >> >>> >>>> > >> >>> >>>> Hello, Mritunjay, > >> >>> >>>> that's good news. Don't you want to try to develop a rsb-set > for exactly this combination of RTEMS4.10 and EPICS7? > >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>> Sure, I am ready to do this and then do it with RTEMS5 in the > same way. Please tell how to begin or some existing similar > >> >>> >>> work that can guide me how to proceed further in relation to > rsb-set for RTEMS4.10 and EPICS7. > >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> I don't know if this is best. RSB didn't exist in 4.10. I haven't > >> >>> >> looked to see how well the rtems-source-builder/4.10 would > support a > >> >>> >> package build. It should be discussed with Chris probably. A > couple of > >> >>> >> packages were added in the 4.11 branch. > >> >>> > >> >>> I would leave 4.10 and move on. It may work but these things can > expose issues > >> >>> that turn into distractions. > >> >>> > >> >>> Would making a script that does the build so we can document the > steps be worth > >> >>> while > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> Yes. Emphatically yes. We need to make sure we know how it is best > built by hand to automate it. > >> >> > >> >> I firmly believe you should not attempt to automate something until > doing it manually is well understood and documented. > >> >> > >> >> After you have this down for one BSP, we need to ask questions like: > >> >> > >> >> + Is there any per BSP tailoring beyond the obviod architecture and > compilation settings? > >> >> > >> >> + Any tweaks to settings users may want? > >> >> > >> >> The manual process should include testing. The RSB is a great way to > automate and ease building but it doesn't address testing the packages yet. > >> >> > >> >> --joel > >> >> > >> >>> > >> >>> Chris > >> >>> _______________________________________________ > >> >>> devel mailing list > >> >>> devel@rtems.org > >> >>> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > >> >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> devel mailing list > >> >> devel@rtems.org > >> >> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel