> >>>> I don't know why there is this "if" in the code. I will ask on a FreeBSD
> >>>> mailing list.
> >>>>
> >>> I think it is for the case that th_generation has changed in between
> >>> saving the th and th_counter. If this happens pps->capgen is set to
> >>> 0 and later pps_event() returns earlier. Since for uniprocessor
> >>> th_generation equal to 0 is not used, I guess we can removed this if
> >>> for those configurations
> >> I asked on a FreeBSD mailing list:
> >>
> >> https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-hackers/2022-June/001165.h
> >> tml
> >>
> > Thanks for asking.
> > I'll prepare and send a new patch removing the "if" for uniprocessor
> > configurations just in case.
>
> Please wait with a new patch for a response from FreeBSD.
>
What is your suggestion here? Should we check the generation only once? Or
should we leave the code as is and just remove the "if" in pps_capture() for
uniprocessor configurations since th_generation equal to zero is not used?
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
