On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 3:27 AM Karel Gardas <karel@functional.vision> wrote: > > On 4/27/23 08:13, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > Why > > don't we use a Git pull request workflow with CI pipelines in the RTEMS > > Project? > > I don't know, but certainly github.com is not available as an > open-source solution which may be seen as a major roadblock. Am I right > assuming that GitLab Community is the most close to that and available > for running by anyone? 100% this is the main reason, and most likely GitLab is where we would go. I believe the main issue to getting that in place at the moment is appropriate mechanisms to fund the remaining server upgrades and then installation/setup of the gitlab service on RTEMS Project infrastructure.
> As an observer on another project with GitLab (GHC Haskell compiler) > I've seen this solution is not free as a work free, but requires some > man-hours investments... > Yes. > So the question after "yes" to migrate (if the consensus is found!) is > "who will pay the price and do the job"... > Yes. Generally speaking, we have an excellent IT support in the background via Amar, but it can be a lot of work for him at times, and anything beyond the usual maintenance activities definitely requires more time/money allocations. > Karel > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel