Hi Yuxin,

"10" is the number of words transferred via IPC. Otherwise, the IPC is a signal 
with no data component.

As you guessed, "low to High"/"High to Low" represent scheduling priority.

  - Alex


________________________________________
From: Yuxin Ren [[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, 19 October 2014 02:36
To: Alexander Kroh
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [seL4] IPC performance for slowpath

Hi Alex,

Your results are great!!
Thank you so much.
I want to confirm something.

Inter-AS Call(10)       1008
What is meaning of "10" ?

Inter-AS Call   980
Inter-AS Call (Low to High)     1050
Inter-AS Call (High to Low)     1463
Here, "Low and High" means the priority of process, right?
So without that, it means those two process have same priority. Is this true?

Thank you.
Yuxin

On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Alexander Kroh 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Yuxin,

Below our our benchmark results. Figures are in cycles and do not include the 
cost of a the system call.

Intra-AS Call   756
Intra-AS ReplyWait      742
Inter-AS Call   980
Inter-AS ReplyWait      987
Inter-AS Call (Low to High)     1050
Inter-AS ReplyWait (High to Low)        1540
Inter-AS Call (High to Low)     1463
Inter-AS ReplyWait (Low to High)        1043
Inter-AS Send   1043
Inter-AS Call(10)       1008
Inter-AS ReplyWait(10)  1015

  - Alex


________________________________________
From: Devel [[email protected]] on behalf of Yuxin Ren 
[[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: Saturday, 18 October 2014 08:32
To: [email protected]
Subject: [seL4] IPC performance for slowpath

Hi All,

I find there have slow and fast path for IPC.
I want to know the performance difference between those two.
More accurate, on x86, how many cycles for slow path round-trip ipc between two 
address space?(on single core)
And how many for fast path?

Thank you very much.

Yuxin

________________________________

The information in this e-mail may be confidential and subject to legal 
professional privilege and/or copyright. National ICT Australia Limited accepts 
no liability for any damage caused by this email or its attachments.


_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://sel4.systems/lists/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to