Hi, Any feedback on this? I'm probably not submitting patches in the
correct style - please guide me on what you need?
Thanks
Ed W
On 11/06/2020 17:57, Ed W wrote:
On 11/06/2020 17:20, Ed W wrote:
Hi!
Haha! So obvious now that you've pointed it out!! Yes, I confirm that
this is the problem! I never even thought to look for such macros
upstream! Thanks!
OK, can I propose a patch to uclibc-ng to change the naming of the
unused fields to include "uclibc" in the name. This is in the style
of glibc, which does the same (only with __glibc_unused)
Signed off: Ed Wildgoose <[email protected]>
Apologies. Previous patch was obviously useless... I'm tired and not
thinking before writing. More useful patch submitted, it amends all
architectures and renames the spare fields to include a namespace
(__uclibc_).
Patch created with:
sed -i -e 's/__unused/__uclibc_unused/'
libc/sysdeps/linux/*/bits/*stat.h
This is inline with what glibc is doing, they tend to call spare
fields either __glibc_unused or __glibc_reserved
Thanks so much for putting me on the right track to resolving this
Ed W
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.uclibc-ng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.uclibc-ng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
