On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Tim Roberts wrote:

> On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:12:21 -0800 (PST), Mark Vojkovich wrote:
> 
> >On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Tim Roberts wrote:
> >
> >  [...]
> >
> >> As I recall, there is work going on to eliminate this problem by allowing 
> >> our drivers to claim a whole range of PCI IDs, eliminating the need for 
> >> xf86PciInfo.h.  Is that work present in 4.3.0?
> >
> >   xf86PciInfo.h isn't needed.  I stopped adding NVIDIA cards to it
> >a while ago.  I'm not really sure why we even have an xf86PciInfo.h.
> >The burden supporting a particular device ID is, and I believe always
> >has been, in the driver.  Merely adding a PCI ID to xf86PciInfo.h
> >doesn't add support for that PCI ID.
> 
> What you say is true, EXCEPT for "XFree86 -configure".  At least as late as 
> 4.2.1, the automatic configuration stuff will refuse to run if the PCI id is 
> not in xf86PciIfno.h.
> 
> Does your nv hack solve that?
> 

   I don't know anything about "-configure".  And I can't put PCI IDs
in xf86PciInfo.h if I don't know what they are.  The point of my nv
hack was to support cards that haven't come out yet.


                        MArk.
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to