Around 0 o'clock on Feb 4, "Mike A. Harris" wrote: > Is there anywhere in the X source code that *gasp* uses ANSI > trigraphs and relies on this broken^Wwonderful feature of ANSI C > being enabled? ;o)
I sure hope not. I've certainly never seen any such code (and would have fixed it if I had). > I'm wondering wether disabling trigraphs by default in stock > sources is considered OK, or if I should have my patch escape the > trigraph sequences to not be tokenized instead? You should fix your patch to not use that trigraph. Does GCC have a mode that pukes if it finds any trigraphs? That would be a better option than disabling them; X gets built with other compilers still, some of which might not have an option to disable trigraphs. -keith _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
