On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Keith Packard wrote: >> Is there anywhere in the X source code that *gasp* uses ANSI >> trigraphs and relies on this broken^Wwonderful feature of ANSI C >> being enabled? ;o) > >I sure hope not. I've certainly never seen any such code (and would have >fixed it if I had). > >> I'm wondering wether disabling trigraphs by default in stock >> sources is considered OK, or if I should have my patch escape the >> trigraph sequences to not be tokenized instead? > >You should fix your patch to not use that trigraph. Does GCC have a mode >that pukes if it finds any trigraphs? That would be a better option than >disabling them; X gets built with other compilers still, some of which >might not have an option to disable trigraphs.
Yeppers, that's the most sensible solution, and the one I've decided to take as well. Thanks for the feedback Keith -- Mike A. Harris _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
