Around 23 o'clock on Feb 19, David Dawes wrote: > Yes, I think that should work (providing we don't get too much other > stuff included as a result of including setjmp.h directly).
Is there any interest in having this tested before a final patch is committed? I run only Debian here for practical reasons and so there is a possibility this won't work on other machines. I fear a macro wrapper for setjmp in some environment, but I'm not quite sure what we'd do about it. > I'd set the size of xf86jmp_buf to something "large". Maybe 4K would > be sufficiently large without being excessive? Might as well; it's used only inside freetype at this point when opening a new face; that operation involves a lot more memory than this. -keith _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
