On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 10:30:53PM -0800, Keith Packard wrote: >Around 23 o'clock on Feb 19, David Dawes wrote: > >> Yes, I think that should work (providing we don't get too much other >> stuff included as a result of including setjmp.h directly). > >Is there any interest in having this tested before a final patch is >committed? I run only Debian here for practical reasons and so there is a >possibility this won't work on other machines. I fear a macro wrapper for >setjmp in some environment, but I'm not quite sure what we'd do about it.
Yes, it should get some more testing. I have checked on a few FreeBSD and Solaris versions, and they don't use macros. I can't remember if ANSI C makes any guarantees about being able to get the address of most functions (other than some defined exceptions). David -- David Dawes Release Engineer/Architect The XFree86 Project www.XFree86.org/~dawes _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
