On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 15:50:46 +0200 Thomas Winischhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(Bbabbled:
(B
(B> Since I recently found out that SiS hardware _does_ support per-pixel
(B> alpha-blended bitblits, I could finish the (yet disabled) render
(B> acceleration.
(B>
(B> The only problem I encountered: The functions that I provide
(B> (SetupFor/SubsequentCPUToScreen[Alpha]Texture) are never called as it
(B> seems....
(B>
(B> How come?
(B>
(B> Shouldn't AA text be drawn using these functions?
(B>
(B> Is there any test program for this?
(B
(Bplease please please PLEASE! accelerate everythig you can :)
(B
(Bhttp://www.rasterman.com/files/render_bench.tar.gz
(Bhttp://www.rasterman.com/files/imlib2-1.1.0.tar.gz
(B
(Bthis might be handy for you as a way of 1. measuring correctness (well so it
(B"looks right" - imlib2's algorithms are intended to do the right thing and look
(Bright - not follow a strict formula - so ymmv here, but its better than
(Bnothing). and 2. - especially useful, measuring speed vs. what can be done in
(Bsoftware on the client-side.
(B
(Bif xrender can't beat client side rendering with the cpu either 1. the gfx card
(Bsimply is too slow and the driver probably should test its own xrender software
(Broutines vs. hardware ones on init and chose the faster for the situation and
(Balso if using software routines try and force source and destination into system
(Bmemory, not keep them in video ram. also accounting for coimbinations of ops,
(Bsizes of source and dest etc.
(B
(B:)
(B
(B--
(B--------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------------
(BThe Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
$B7'<*(B - $Bhttp://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
