Keith Packard writes: > Around 21 o'clock on Sep 22, Ivan Pascal wrote: > > > Also I added a flag for timers TimerNeedsCheckInput. The timers without this > > flag are processed before the select all others are delaied until the second > > timers check. (The second check doesn't distinguish those timers.) > > I think that's overkill; the simple expediency of returning 0 from > WaitForSomething after a timer has been processed will make sure that any > effects of the timer are reflected at every scheduling stage.
Why can't we return on the condition that a timer has been run that has modified the select mask? Egbert. _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
