On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 02:39:46PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote: > I see that $Devel::NYTProf::VERSION is now 4.00 > > Currently the profile format is (I believe) compatible with 3.00 > > If retaining profile format compatibility isn't essential between major > versions, would this be a good time to get rid of the vestigial (unused) > features. > > (extra_items in SUB_INFO, and the two NVs in SUB_CALLERS. Have I missed any?)
Yes, The always-zero $eval_fid and $eval_line for the callbacks for time_block and time_line On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 10:40:11AM +0100, Tim Bunce wrote: > On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 08:35:55PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote: > > On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 08:03:15PM +0100, Tim Bunce wrote: > > > The two NVs in SUB_CALLERS are a higher priority than extra_items in > > > SUB_INFO. I'd be happy to see them removed if you're offering :) > > > > Not until tomorrow. > > > > I didn't do this "earlier" because I wasn't aware until the bump to 4.00 > > that there was any intent to do an "incompatible" release. > > > > > [extra_items in SUB_INFO was meant for future-proofing but that should > > > really be done by a once-off header item that says "in this version of > > > the data stream tags of type X have Y items". But that can wait.] > > > > So it can go for now? > > Yeap, extra_items can go. Done in r1260, r1261, r1262. Nicholas Clark -- You've received this message because you are subscribed to the Devel::NYTProf Development User group. Group hosted at: http://groups.google.com/group/develnytprof-dev Project hosted at: http://perl-devel-nytprof.googlecode.com CPAN distribution: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Devel-NYTProf To post, email: [email protected] To unsubscribe, email: [email protected]
