Hi, * Randy Kramer wrote (2007-12-21 09:23): >On Wednesday 19 December 2007 06:04 pm, Thorsten Haude wrote: >> There are a lot of functions and smaller sections of code which are >> largely uncommented, so you can add a *lot* of words before becoming >> a nuisance. > >I'll consider doing that, but I don't feel very confident in my abilities in C >(as I am still attempting to learn)--if I get to the point of thinking about >committing any comments, I'll probably post to the list first to get comments >(on the comments).
Well, you have no choice as long as you don't have write access.
Anyway, feel free to bring up any question about NEdit that comes up,
on- or off-list. I'm far from the best coder around here, so I can
learn a lot from discussions like these.
>Now that I've started looking at the code by skimming each .h and .c file (as
>opposed to the attempt I made a few years ago where I tried to look at main{}
>and then sort of trace everything from there) the code doesn't look all that
>bad to me.
>
>Of course, I'm a newbie to C, X, and nedit development, so I'm not really in a
>position to judge. Clearly there's a lot I don't understand, but I don't see
>things that seem really dumb to me.
Glad to hear that!
Thorsten Kristin Hersh: Teeth
--
Gerade wenn wir alle ganz sichergehen wollen, schaffen
wir eine Welt voll äußerster Unsicherheit
- Dag Hammarskjöld
pgpfeymeLSBwM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- NEdit Develop mailing list - [email protected] http://www.nedit.org/mailman/listinfo/develop
