On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 09:33:11 +0200 "Bert Wesarg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, > > May be, it is a time to fix the CVS code as NEdit 5.6 and open new branch? > Just my thoughts: > > * ignore the binaries > * branch off a 5.6 release and tag it as beta1, rc1, or whatever NOW > * make the tarball and upload it to SF > * people can provide binaries if they want > * linux distributors will provide own binaries I think, 32bit-linux-static binary is needed. Many users (including "64bit users", I hope) will happy with it. Standard binary is needed to separate code bugs from bugs introduced by the "compilation environment". > * think about a policy for committing patches/features to master > (there are so many, that we should narrow this down) > > To the last point, maybe we can create multiple branches (one for > macro language, one for general editor features, ...) so that we have > multiple playgrounds, from where we build master and tag betas. > > Just my 2ct > > Bert > Alexey -- NEdit Develop mailing list - [email protected] http://www.nedit.org/mailman/listinfo/develop
