Of course there are good reasons to do something or not to do something, but my concern is I would like to have A+B+C. Now my choice is A or B or C, unless I spend time to look every changes carefully and manually merge them into the code.
Regards, JF --- On Thu, 9/11/08, Bert Wesarg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Bert Wesarg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] consolidate macro ops > To: "NEdit development list" <[email protected]> > Date: Thursday, September 11, 2008, 12:29 PM > On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 16:59, John Ferrier > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Does this patch contain your previous "PATCH > v3" and " PATCH skip indirection for NUMBER > tokens"? Can you confirm this? > No, I would have mentioned it. ;-) > > I post mostly independent patches. The dependency in > "PATCH skip > indirection for NUMBER tokens" (the patch itself is > called > pushImmed.patch) was pure laziness on my side. Each patch > is based on > current CVS head, if not otherwise mentioned. > > > > > do you have a patch based on your ""PATCH > v3" and "PATCH skip indirection for NUMBER > tokens"? > No, but I have patches for parse-define.patch and > pushImmed.patch > based on this consolidate-ops.patch. > > You find them here: > > http://repo.or.cz/w/nedit-bw.git > > This is a git repo of my quilt queue. > > If you are familiar with these two programs it should be > straight > forward to use this repo. > > If not I could and will provide simple instructions how to > use this. > > Regards > Bert > > > > > Thx, > > > > JF > -- > NEdit Develop mailing list - [email protected] > http://www.nedit.org/mailman/listinfo/develop -- NEdit Develop mailing list - [email protected] http://www.nedit.org/mailman/listinfo/develop
