On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Muhammad Alkarouri wrote: > Another point, Behdad. As long as there is a standard or a decision > already taken we should abide by it. If it needs a change we need some > discussion, or at least a notification before changing. > The Makefile.cvs existing in the bicon cvs was not in anybody's way, I > think, so you needn't have removed it before explaining your point. > Especially that the 'will be' developer's guide did not give us a > ./bootstrap option, without a Makefile.cvs/autogen.sh.
Sorry for that, I did that since the Source Code section of Dev Guide is labled as optional or so. I must confess I'm biased here since Makefile.cvs is KDEish. > > * Manpages: They are old and being kinda deprecated. The > > format is evil and other stuff. Many (GNU) recommends info > > pages, but they are not necessarily easier to write. For > > example, GNU FriBidi is asked to have info pages instead of man. > > Man pages are old, but they have not been _successfully_ deprecated (if > you get what I mean). I wouldn't require info pages as a must, a mention > is probably worth it. Got you. Just if there were really WYSIWYG editors for them :(. > Muhammad Alkarouri --behdad behdad.org _______________________________________________ Developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.arabeyes.org/mailman/listinfo/developer
