--- Behdad Esfahbod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > First of all, for the record or consideration, I note that I > really like the idea of having the developer's guide, but want to > note that they should be there to remind important things, not to > force developers.
<personal note> I agree fully </personal> :-) But I also would mention that all the issues noted in the guide are to be addressed (implemented in some manner) and not merely remembered :-) > - bootstrap IS the prefered way. I'm not sure anyone has ever > read the related part of the Autotools book, it's here: > > http://sources.redhat.com/autobook/autobook/autobook_43.html 'bootstrap' sounds fine to me. That way you are consistent across _all_ projects. > * Well, many people like RCS headers, that doesn't look bad, > but I don't think it should be a mandatory thing either. This I think I'd take-up issue with. We need to see at a min the '$Id$' tag on the file so that its version is noted. All of arabeyes' scripts/files have a more elaborate header that we use as a template. Salam. - Nadim __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/ _______________________________________________ Developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.arabeyes.org/mailman/listinfo/developer
