--- Mohammed Elzubeir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Then, you have cases like PuTTY where it was more than just a license
> issue.. it was a matter of policy to not used shared libraries. What do
> we do here? We really had no choice.
In PuTTY it was a matter of policy == a matter of personal liking. A fork of
PuTTY with bidi support is almost as good (as bad) as a replacement of existing
BiDi implementation. Why don't Arabeyes people feel they are respectable enough
to have a policy not changed whenever someone outside 'has a policy'?
> I agree -- but what about the instances where it's not an option?
Due to policy issues or technically?
> > That's the root of our disagreement ;).
>
> That's a personal preference -- has nothing to do with
> Arabeyes/*bidi/etc.
If reasons are due to 'policy' issues, then personal preferences have
everything to do with it. It was a personal preference to join Arabeyes, not a
business venture.
Salam,
Muhammad Alkarouri
____________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping"
your friends today! Download Messenger Now
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/download/index.html
_______________________________________________
Developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.arabeyes.org/mailman/listinfo/developer
