--- Samy Al Bahra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The ITL release process is far from perfect and far from satisfactory.
> During the creation of the FreeBSD port for libitl, several things were
> noted.
>
> 1) When the distribution file is uncompressed, it must uncompress to
> libitl-${VERSION} and not itl-libs.
My bad - it currently uncompresses to itl/lib-$(VERSION). I'll take
care of this for next releases.
> 2) When announced, libitl should be announced as a seperate package than
> itools.
That is already the case.
> 3) The library naming scheme is incorrect. libitl-${VERSION}.so is not a
> standard naming convention and will create conistency issues with
> many systems for future ITL software.
Agreed. The '-$(VERSION)' should not be there. I'll leave this for Thamer.
Salam.
- Nadim
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The all-new My Yahoo! - Get yours free!
http://my.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
Developer mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.arabeyes.org/mailman/listinfo/developer
