--- Thamer Mahmoud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Samy Al Bahra writes:
> [...]
> > 3) The library naming scheme is incorrect. libitl-${VERSION}.so is not a
> > standard naming convention and will create conistency issues with
> > many systems for future ITL software.
>
> It is actually libitl.${VERSION}.so (i.e. with a dot), which is even
> worse.
>
> I see a lot of version numbers after the .so in Debian's
> "/usr/lib". Would something like this "libitl.so.0.0.6" be
> appropriate? Anyways, I've made this change in CVS and it is also
> easier to remove the all ${VERSION} info now.
I guess you can always create a symlink (libitl.so -> libitl.so.xxxx),
but then again I don't know what is normal. I'd guess having a single
installed libitl.so seems appropriate.
Salam.
- Nadim
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The all-new My Yahoo! - Get yours free!
http://my.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
Developer mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.arabeyes.org/mailman/listinfo/developer
