Igor Kozhukhov <[email protected]> wrote: > > This includes pathnames that fit the target platform. > > > > So again my question: do you have a special reason for not using the > > available > > sources? > > answer again : i?m using available illumos sources, they are tested with > dilos-illumos builds on Intel and SPARC. > i?m not using Linux/Solaris and others firends with builds of my sources - i > just use it on DilOS, but on Intel + SPARC plarforms, and i wanted to share > my work to others who are interested in illumos version of dmake with gmake > build. > > I have plans try to port it to illumos-extra and test with SmartOS builds, > but it will be later when i have time.
So you are not interested in the bugfixes that are available in the Schilytools tarball? You are not interested in portability? I just try to understand why someone would like to spend effort in something that already exists. Jörg -- EMail:[email protected] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin [email protected] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.org/private/ http://sf.net/projects/schilytools/files/' ------------------------------------------ openzfs-developer Archives: https://openzfs.topicbox.com/groups/developer/discussions/T16a43708a7c1f122-M9a9115b3e7b7f422585b20a0 Powered by Topicbox: https://topicbox.com
