> On Jul 5, 2017, at 1:57 PM, Joerg Schilling > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Igor Kozhukhov <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> This includes pathnames that fit the target platform. >>> >>> So again my question: do you have a special reason for not using the >>> available >>> sources? >> >> answer again : i?m using available illumos sources, they are tested with >> dilos-illumos builds on Intel and SPARC. >> i?m not using Linux/Solaris and others firends with builds of my sources - i >> just use it on DilOS, but on Intel + SPARC plarforms, and i wanted to share >> my work to others who are interested in illumos version of dmake with gmake >> build. >> >> I have plans try to port it to illumos-extra and test with SmartOS builds, >> but it will be later when i have time. > > So you are not interested in the bugfixes that are available in the > Schilytools > tarball? > > You are not interested in portability?
well - additional info: i’m interested in bugfixes and additional changes - but if they are available for illumos and will be applicable for illumos builds. right now - all available on illumos-gate tree with review and integration. i don’t want waste my time for another changes if they can break my builds - right now i’m interested in illumos version of dmake for illumos based builds. -Igor > > I just try to understand why someone would like to spend effort in something > that already exists. > > Jörg > > -- > EMail:[email protected] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin > [email protected] (work) Blog: > http://schily.blogspot.com/ > URL: http://cdrecord.org/private/ http://sf.net/projects/schilytools/files/' ------------------------------------------ openzfs-developer Archives: https://openzfs.topicbox.com/groups/developer/discussions/T16a43708a7c1f122-M1f9472b86f767e626e4f0734 Powered by Topicbox: https://topicbox.com
