On 2/16/18 9:17 , Prakash Surya wrote: > @rmustacc OK. So, if I'm understanding you correctly, you'd like us to take > the taskq implementation from libfakekernel, move it into a new userspace > library (e.g. libutaskq), and then make libfakekernel and libzfs consume this > new library? >
I think that both matches what you would have originally done and it'd probably make more sense from a design perspective. But I also don't want to be the one forcing everyone to do more busy work if I'm the only one who thinks that. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/536#issuecomment-366300189 ------------------------------------------ openzfs-developer Archives: https://openzfs.topicbox.com/groups/developer/discussions/T22334a01fda83bfd-M591f1afa34ce04814ed6e930 Powered by Topicbox: https://topicbox.com
