Pool creation could definitely be made more efficient. Things to watch out for 
would be that different tests with different numbers of threads would want more 
or fewer files, which would mean they'd want to be different sizes. Also, tests 
should be able to run in any order, so we can't make assumptions about what has 
run, and what will run. There are definitely improvements in this area, but I'd 
rather not lump them in with this fix.

destroy_dataset() already has a ton of consumers in ZoL, so I'd rather keep the 
behavior as it is.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/634#issuecomment-394503446
------------------------------------------
openzfs: openzfs-developer
Permalink: 
https://openzfs.topicbox.com/groups/developer/T0307887c7165c81e-M7428e4d8f0b6c516c837a7bb
Delivery options: https://openzfs.topicbox.com/groups

Reply via email to